Sebestyén
Kodolányi and Csaba Uglár: Abuse
Exhibition in the Museum of Contemporary art - Ludwig Museum Budapest,
project.room
12. November-8. December 2002. Guest curator: Emese Süvecz
Sebestyén Kodolányi and Csaba Uglár’s project
abuses the toposes of confraternity and the noble-spirited sentiments
of men’s brotherhood. The “documentary film”, an experiment,
documents a fraud. The “spiritual community” is dwelling
on some scholarly topic first in a room of utterly mysterious atmosphere,
then sets out and marches along against a backdrop of the streets, the
blocks and the inhabitants of the city. The group of men, in garments
which imitate sacred habits visualise both the brotherhood of men in
the gospels of the classical early Christian world and the life of orthodox
monasteries today, as known to the western world mostly from documentary
films. The camera, following the gloomy figures on a sunny summer afternoon
goes on a pilgrimage through the embankments, the empty streets and
neglected tenement blocks of Budapest, till finally drops into the vortex
of the carnival.
picture1
The objective character of the project however proves to be a fraud;
the observer of the scene gradually realises that the camera is filming
itself throughout. The employment of a documentary style and the implicit
objectivity of it is sheer imitation. Communion is only an illusion,
too. The apparently collective marching is actually the internal journey
of the subject. The background “Oriental” music is not an
illustration to, but rather an amplifier of the “apparent documentary
character” of the film; it dramatises the spiritual journey. The
monotony of the music is associated with the well-known atmosphere and
the repetitive rythm of the prayers and other religious ceremonies.
The dramaturgy of the film, the alternation of the inside scenes and
the outside sequences in the city is an allegory of the immersion of
the subject “deeper and deeper” into the self. The language
of the philosophical - religious speculations however is a mumbo - jumbo
imitative of the phraseology of mystical teachings, so what the dramaturgical
trick really means is the illusion of the subject’s reality.
picture2
There is another component of the documentary character, the imitated
Orientalism of quasi folk objects (like the camera with its tawdry sequin
decoration and felt - tip pen calligraphy organised to create a uniform
surface in the sense of horror vacui) which, again, is a paraphrase
of the Oriental sacred aesthetics. The deliberate exoticism of the Oriental
world is a fraud as well as allusion to the sacred myths of the brotherhood
which suggest universality and timelessness, especially because the
ideology behind the “noble - spirited sentiments of men’s
brotherhood” operates another possible type of bonds among men,
this is the heroism and solidarity of terrorists. The ethos of sacred
confraternity thus turns into the narrative of monk - colonel/major
characters in which the world of Oriental objects is replaced by a series
of hints at the mass-murdering militant functions of technology.
picture3
Kodolányi and Uglár’s Abuse is manoeuvring off the
well-known toposes of masculine subjectivity embedded in Oriental and
technological pseudo-folklore. Their story is documented partly with
solemn and charismatic declarations, partly with somewhat theatrical
scenes. Thus they direct a parody of the old banalities of masculine
myths, a parody of themselves in fact which will complete their fraud
when their artistic subjectivity scintillates through abuse and illusion
and still talks to us.
Emese Süvecz